Including umbilical hernia complications, emergency appendicectomies and medical circumcisions
Umbilical Hernia Complication rate
Metric
The percentage of children with Umbilical Hernia complications.
Numerator
- Umbilical Hernia: OPCS code T24 and T97
- Spells with any of the following complications:
OPCS codes
- Drainage of wound abscess: S47.2, S47.4
OR ICD10 codes
- Haemorrhage and haematoma complicating a procedure ICD10: T81.0
Patients aged 19 years old and under at the start of their admission
Denominator
- Umbilical Hernia: OPCS code T24 and T97
- Patients aged 19 years old and under at the start of their admission
Data Source / Time frame
April 2009- March 2010
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used
Crude rate
30 day standardised mortality ratio for Emergency Appendicectomy
Metric
The ratio of the observed number of in-hospital child deaths within 30 days of the date of the main procedure to the expected number of deaths, multiplied by 100.
Numerator
Death in hospital within 30 days of the date of main procedure (or date of admission if missing/invalid) in this spell. Death is flagged on spells with method of discharge as death (DISMETH=4 and 5), defined by specific diagnosis codes for the primary diagnosis of the spell.
- Emergency Appendicectomy Definition:
Emergency appendicectomy in any procedure field accompanied by a procedure code for laparoscopic approach to abdominal cavity
Emergency appendicectomy:
H01 - Emergency excision of appendix
H028 - Other specified other excision of appendix
H029 - Unspecified other excision of appendix
Laparoscopic approach to abdominal cavity:
Y751 - Laparoscopically assisted approach to abdominal cavity
Y752 - Laparoscopic approach to abdominal cavity NEC
- Patients aged 19 years old and under at the start of their admission
Denominator
- Emergency Appendicectomy Definition:
Emergency appendicectomy in any procedure field accompanied by a procedure code for laparoscopic approach to abdominal cavity
Emergency appendicectomy:
H01 - Emergency excision of appendix
H028 - Other specified other excision of appendix
H029 - Unspecified other excision of appendix
Laparoscopic approach to abdominal cavity:
Y751 - Laparoscopically assisted approach to abdominal cavity
Y752 - Laparoscopic approach to abdominal cavity NEC
- Patients aged 19 years old and under at the start of their admission
Expected number of in-hospitals deaths derived from logistic regression, adjusting for factors to indirectly standardise for difference in case-mix.
Adjustments are made for:
- Sex
- Age on admission (in five year bands up to 90+)
- Admission method (non-elective or elective)
- Socio-economic deprivation quintile of the area of residence of the patient (based on the Carstairs Index)
- Primary procedure
- Co-morbidities (Dr Foster methodology, see Appendix A)
- Number of previous emergency admissions
- Year of discharge (financial year)
- Palliative care (whether the patient is being treated in specialty of palliative care)
- Month of admission
- Ethnicity
- Source of admission
Data Source / Time frame
SUS - April 2009- March 2010
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used
Logistic regression
The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of deaths by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has an RR of 100, that means that the number of patients who died is exactly as it would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. An RR above 100 means more patients died than would be expected; one below 100 means that fewer than expected died.
Control limits
Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display ‘common-cause variation’; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display ‘special-cause variation’ - that is, where the trust’s rate diverges significantly from the national rate.
Emergency Appendicectomy Adjusted Average Length of Stay
Metric
Adjusted average length of stay for children receiving an emergency appendicectomy.
Observed
Average length of stay for all discharges among cases meeting the inclusion and exclusion rules for the denominator.
Expected
Expected length of stay is adjusted to indirectly standardise for differences in co-morbidities.
- Inpatients only
- Emergency appendicectomy in any procedure field accompanied by a procedure code for laparoscopic approach to abdominal cavity
Emergency appendicectomy:
H01 - Emergency excision of appendix
H028 - Other specified other excision of appendix
H029 - Unspecified other excision of appendix
Laparoscopic approach to abdominal cavity:
Y751 - Laparoscopically assisted approach to abdominal cavity
Y752 - Laparoscopic approach to abdominal cavity NEC
- Patients aged 19 years old and under at the start of their admission
Time frame
April 2009- March 2010
Basis
Acute Trust (excluding specialists)
Statistical methods used
Indirect standardisation, adjusted for:
- age
- sex
- deprivation (carstairs qunitiles, 2001)
- Co-morbidities (Dr Foster methodology, see Appendix A)
Emergency Appendicectomy Readmission Rate
Metric
The rate (expressed as a percentage) of children receiving emergency appendicectomies that result in a second operation being performed within a year.
Numerator
All spells that occur within a year of the patient’s emergency appendicectomy (the index procedure) where drainage of abscess of appendix, percutaneous abscess drainage, drainage/incision of lesion, or freeing of adhesions are coded in any procedure field.
Drainage of abscess of appendix:
H031 - Drainage of abscess of appendix
H032 - Drainage of appendix NEC
H038 - Other specified other operations on appendix
H039 - Unspecified other operations on appendix
T343 - Open drainage of abdominal abscess NEC
Percutaneous abscess drainage:
T451 - Image controlled percutaneous drainage of subphrenic abscess
T452 - Image controlled percutaneous drainage of pelvic abscess
T453 - Image controlled percutaneous drainage of abdominal abscess NEC
Drainage/Incision of lesion:
S472 - Drainage of lesion of skin NEC
S474 - Incision of lesion of skin NEC
Freeing of adhesions:
T413 - Freeing of adhesions of peritoneum
T415 - Freeing of extensive adhesions of peritoneum
T423 - Endoscopic division of adhesions of peritoneum
All spells that occur within a year of the patient’s emergency appendicectomy (the index procedure) where adhesive obstruction is coded in any diagnosis field.
Adhesive Obstruction:
K565 - Intestinal adhesions [bands] with obstruction
K660 - Peritoneal adhesions
Denominator
- Emergency appendicectomy in any procedure field accompanied by a procedure code for laparoscopic approach to abdominal cavity
Emergency appendicectomy:
H01 - Emergency excision of appendix
H028 - Other specified other excision of appendix
H029 - Unspecified other excision of appendix
Laparoscopic approach to abdominal cavity:
Y751 - Laparoscopically assisted approach to abdominal cavity
Y752 - Laparoscopic approach to abdominal cavity NEC
- Patients aged 19 years old and under at the start of their admission
Data Source
SUS - CDS
Time frame
Discharge for the index emergency appendicectomy procedure must have occurred between April 2008 and March 2009.
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used
Logistic regression model, adjusted for the following factors:
- method of admission
- age
- Severity using the following ICD10 codes; K350, Acute appendicitis with generalised peritonitis and K351, Acute appendicitis.
Logistic regression
The ratio is calculated by dividing the actual number of readmissions by the expected number and multiplying the figure by 100. It is expressed as a relative risk, where a risk rating of 100 represents the national average. If the trust has an RR of 100, that means that the number of patients who were readmitted is exactly as it would be expected taking into account the standardisation factors. An RR above 100 means more patients were readmitted than would be expected; one below 100 means there were fewer than expected readmissions.
Control limits
Control limits tell us the range of values which are consistent with random or chance variation. Data points falling within the control limits are consistent with random or chance variation and are said to display ‘common-cause variation’; for data points falling outside the control limits, chance is an unlikely explanation and hence they are said to display ‘special-cause variation’ - that is, where the trust’s rate diverges significantly from the national rate.
Hydrocele - % children under 2 years
Metric
The percentage of children receiving an operation on a Hydrocele sac, under 2 years old.
Numerator
- Hydrocele: OPCS code N11
- Patients aged under 2 years old at the start of their admission
Denominator
- Hydrocele: OPCS code N11
- Patients aged 19 years old and under at the start of their admission
Data Source / Time frame
April 2009- March 2010
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used
Crude rate
Hydrocele Complication rate
Metric
The percentage of children receiving an operation with a Hydrocele sac with complications.
Numerator
- Hydrocele: OPCS code N11
- Spells with any of the following complications:
OPCS codes
- Drainage of wound abscess: S47.2, S47.4
- Orchidectomy N06.3
OR
ICD10 codes
- Haemorrhage and haematoma complicating a procedure ICD10: T81.0
- Patients aged 19 years old and under at the start of their admission
Denominator
- Hydrocele: OPCS code N11
- Patients aged 19 years old and under at the start of their admission
Data Source / Time frame
April 2009- March 2010
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used
Crude rate
Medical Circumcision - % children under 5 years
Metric
The percentage of children receiving a medical circumcision, under 5 years old.
Numerator
- Medical circumcision: OPCS code N303
- Patients aged under 5 years old at the start of their admission
Denominator
- Medical circumcision: OPCS code N303
- Patients aged 19 years old and under at the start of their admission
Data Source / Time frame
April 2009- March 2010
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used
Crude rate
Medical Circumcision Complication rate
Metric
The percentage of children receiving a medical circumcision with complications.
Numerator
- Medical circumcision: OPCS code N303
- Spells with any of the following complications:
OPCS codes
- Cauterization of lesion of penis N27.2
- Plastic operations on penis N28.8, N28.9
- Drainage of penis N32.2
- Other operations on penis N32.8, N32.9
OR
ICD10 codes
- Haemorrhage and haematoma complicating a procedure ICD10: T81.0
- Other specified disorders of penis ICD10: N48.8
- Patients aged 19 years old and under at the start of their admission
Denominator
- Medical circumcision: OPCS code N303
- Patients aged 19 years old and under at the start of their admission
Data Source / Time frame
April 2009- March 2010
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used
Crude rate
One Stage Inguinal Orchidopexy Complication rate
Metric
The percentage of children receiving a one stage inguinal orchidopexy with complications.
Numerator
Discharges among cases meeting the inclusion and exclusion rules for the denominator with any of the following complications:
OPCS codes
- Orchidectomy NEC N063
- Drainage of lesion of skin NEC S472
- Incision of lesion of skin NEC S474
OR
ICD10 codes
- Haemorrhage and haematoma complicating a procedure T810
Denominator
One stage orchidopexy codes in any procedure field accompanied by a procedure code for minimal access to abdominal cavity (Y75).
One Stage Orchidopexy:
N082 - One stage bilateral orchidopexy NEC
N092 - One stage orchidopexy NEC
- Patients aged 19 years old and under at the start of their admission
Data Source / Time frame
April 2009- March 2010
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used
Crude rate
One Stage Inguinal Orchidopexy Reoperation rate
Metric
The percentage of spells for patients 18 and under for one stage inguinal orchidopexy that result in a second operation being performed within a year.
Numerator
All spells that resulted in another one stage inguinal orchidopexy being performed within a year of the last orchidopexy procedure (the index procedure).
Denominator
One stage orchidopexy codes in any procedure field accompanied by a procedure code for minimal access to abdominal cavity (Y75).
One Stage Orchidopexy:
N082 - One stage bilateral orchidopexy NEC
N092 - One stage orchidopexy NEC
- Patients aged 19 years old and under at the start of their admission
Data Source
SUS - CDS
Time frame
Discharge for the index one stage inguinal orchidopexy must have occurred between April 2008 and March 2009.
Statistical methods used
Crude rate expressed as a percentage
Umbilical Hernia - % children under 2 years
Metric
The percentage of children with Umbilical Hernia, under 2 years old.
Numerator
- Umbilical Hernia: OPCS code T24 and T97
- Patients aged under 2 years old at the start of their admission
Denominator
- Umbilical Hernia: OPCS code T24 and T97
- Patients aged 19 years old and under at the start of their admission
Data Source / Time frame
April 2009- March 2010
Basis
Acute Trust
Statistical methods used
Crude rate
Appendix A: Charlson score
Condition No. | Condition Name | Weight |
1 | Acute myocardial infarction | 5 |
2 | Cerebral vascular accident | 11 |
3 | Congestive heart failure | 13 |
4 | Connective tissue disorder | 4 |
5 | Dementia | 14 |
6 | Diabetes | 3 |
7 | Liver disease | 8 |
8 | Peptic ulcer | 9 |
9 | Peripheral vascular disease | 6 |
10 | Pulmonary disease | 4 |
11 | Cancer | 8 |
12 | Diabetes complications | -1 |
13 | Paraplegia | 1 |
14 | Renal disease | 10 |
15 | Metastatic cancer | 14 |
16 | Severe liver disease | 18 |
17 | HIV | 2 |
Your feedback
Please share any concerns or suggestions for improvement that you might have regarding this indicator. In particular, please consider these questions:
- Are there any diagnosis or procedure codes that have been included that you believe should be removed? Please give your reasons
- Are there any diagnosis or procedure codes that have been omitted that you believe should be included? Please give your reasons
- What are the strengths and weaknesses of this metric as an indicator
You can use the feedback box below to submit comments to HSJ. Alternatively, you can email Dr Foster directly at HGconsult2010@drfoster.co.uk. Please submit your response by 31 August 2010.
Downloads
More about the Hospital Guide
PDF, Size 0.14 mbPaediatric Basket (Word)
Other, Size 0.18 mb
AHRQ patient safety indicator composite
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4Currently reading
Paediatric basket
- 5
- 6
No comments yet