Report comment

I am responding to Eric's reasonable interpretation that my levels of leadership are too formulaic. I don't see it that way. These are not competency interpretations but skills, knowledge and experience interpretations which lead to levels of competency, just as innovation attributes and skills in articulation of the innovation leads to a competency. Level 1 skills are the behaviours that are so far not taught and graringly missing focused on building trust and commitment; level 3 skills are those to which Eric refers as enhancing the innovative, entreprenaurial and other imaginative attributes of leadership so vital for future growth - I call this level eclectic as it draws on all the experience, theories, principles that individuals accrue. I didn't describe the attributes of a successful leader in my last contribution, but will add these later although they can be found in the Code of Conduct paper from IHM.